Naturalness and supersymmetry by Kaustubh Sadanand Agashe

By Kaustubh Sadanand Agashe

Show description

Read or Download Naturalness and supersymmetry PDF

Similar nonfiction_7 books

Consumers and nanotechnology : deliberative processes and methodologies

Content material: Pt. 1. technology and democracy -- pt. 2. Citizen-oriented deliberative approaches -- pt. three. Stakeholder-oriented deliberative methods -- pt. four. a facet of a extra democratic technology : the way forward for deliberative strategies on nanotechnology and different rising applied sciences

Agile Service Development: Combining Adaptive Methods and Flexible Solutions

Economies world wide have advanced into being principally service-oriented economies. shoppers now not simply desire a printer or a automobile, they fairly ask for a printing carrier or a mobility carrier. additionally, service-oriented firms more and more take advantage of new units, applied sciences and infrastructures.

Hearing – From Sensory Processing to Perception

Listening to – From Sensory Processing to belief provides the papers of the newest “International Symposium on Hearing”, a gathering held each 3 years concentrating on psychoacoustics and the learn of the physiological mechanisms underlying auditory notion. The complaints supply an up to date document at the prestige of the sphere of study into listening to and auditory capabilities.

Additional resources for Naturalness and supersymmetry

Example text

6 The RG scaling of λt was neglected. 1: Contours of c(m2Z ; µ2 ) =(10, 15, 20, 25, 40, 60) for a MSSM with a messenger particle content of one (5 + ¯ 5). (b) and (d) sgn(µ) = +1. The constraints considered are: (I) me˜R =75 GeV , (II) mχ˜01 + mχ˜02 = 160 GeV, (III) me˜R =85 GeV, and (IV) mχ˜01 + mχ˜02 = 180 GeV. A central value of mtop =175 GeV is assumed. 47 (∼ the ultimate LEP2 limit [63]) are also plotted. 1d for sgn(µ) = +1. The constraints from the present and the ultimate LEP2 limits on the chargino mass are weaker than or comparable to those from the selectron and the neutralino masses and are therefore not shown.

Further, if a gauge-singlet and extra vector-like quintets are introduced to generate the “µ” and “Bµ” terms, the fine tuning required to correctly break the electroweak symmetry is more severe. These fine tunings make it difficult to understand, within the context of these models, how SUSY can provide some understanding of the origin of electroweak symmetry breaking and the scale of the Z and W gauge boson masses. It turns out that in models of gauge mediation with a high messenger scale the fine tuning 22 is not much better than in the case of low messenger scale [34].

To obtain a bound on the Rp coupling, we shall assume that the Rp effects dominate the decay rate. 22) can be used to relate Γ[K + → π + ν ν¯] to Γ[K + → π 0 νe+ ]. The effective Hamiltonian for the neutral pion decay channel arises from the spectator decay of the 33 strange quark. It is 4GF ∗ Hef f = √ VKM sL γ µ uL )(¯ νLi γµ eLi ). 23) So in the limit where the lepton masses can be neglected,  λ′ijk 2 2  2 ∗ Γ[K → π νi ν¯i ]    VKM j1 VKM j2  . 24) Rk This ratio is valid for i = 1, 2 or 3, since in the massless neutrino and electron approximation, the integrals over phase space in the numerator and denominator cancel.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.90 of 5 – based on 21 votes