Justice on Trial: Racial Disparities in the American by Wade Henderson

By Wade Henderson

Show description

Read or Download Justice on Trial: Racial Disparities in the American Criminal Justice System PDF

Similar sociology books

The State of Giving Research in Europe: Household Donations to Charitable Organizations in Twelve European Countries

The 1st ebook from the newly proven ecu examine community on Philanthropy, The kingdom of Giving examine in Europe presents an summary of present philanthropic learn in twelve ecu international locations: Austria, Belgium, the Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, eire, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, and the uk.

Wir, ein europäisches Volk?: Sozialintegration Europas und die Idee der Gleichheit aller europäischen Bürger

​Die Eurokrise ist eine der schwersten Krisen der european seit ihrer Gründung. Bei ihrer Lösung geht es nicht allein um den Erfolg von konkreten wirtschaftspolitischen Maßnahmen, sondern um den Zusammenhalt zwischen den Bürgern der verschiedenen Mitgliedsländer. Jürgen Gerhards und Holger Lengfeld entwickeln ein Konzept einer sozial integrierten europäischen Gesellschaft, das auf der Annahme beruht, dass sich die EU-Bürger unabhängig von ihrer jeweils konkreten nationalen Herkunft als Gleiche anerkennen.

Celebrity philanthropy

There’s no doubt that celebrities nowadays are essentially the most widespread faces of philanthropic activity—yet their participation increases questions on efficacy, motivations, and activism total. This publication offers case reviews of megastar philanthropy from round the globe—including such figures as Shakira, Arundhati Roy, Zhang Ziyi, Bono, and Madonna—looking on the tensions among big name activism and ground-level paintings and the connection among big name philanthropy and cultural citizenship.

Values and Social Change in Britain

Ebook by way of Abrams, Mark, Gerard, David

Additional info for Justice on Trial: Racial Disparities in the American Criminal Justice System

Example text

The problem here is that the critic rarely contrasts their own position and substantive intent with Bourdieu’s (even in terms of discipline, philosophy, or cultural context), and so dismisses or overlooks anything that does not fit their own interpretative framework. The third strategy is a form of reductionism. Here, conceptual terms such as ‘habitus’, ‘field’ and ‘reflexivity’ are reduced to ‘agency’, ‘context’ and ‘self-awareness’. As these latter are common in the social sciences, this argument leads to the claim that Bourdieu does nothing special: what he does, they all do – what he shows, 18 M.

Yet, at the same time, caution also needs to be exercised in making too much of Bourdieu. Earlier, I wrote of the dangers of treating his concepts in too broad a manner. I suggested that this metaphorizing of data amounted to little more than embroidering them with various conceptual terms, which leads to a weak form of constructivism. Here, a conceptual term is simply imposed on a piece of data and allowed to speak for itself, giving it a prosaic rather than an analytical meaning. For example, to extend his concepts to the sphere of emotions moves from the representation of dispositions formed from positions in the social space to individual psychologies.

As these latter are common in the social sciences, this argument leads to the claim that Bourdieu does nothing special: what he does, they all do – what he shows, 18 M. Grenfell they already know. Thus, the dynamic between these concepts, which is at the centre of a Bourdieusian approach, is underplayed and the methodological potential undermined. The fourth strategy can really be understood as a form of theoretical and empirical amnesia. Here, the writers claim that what Bourdieu showed is merely something that was always known.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.86 of 5 – based on 21 votes